A Texas Employer's Response to an EEOC Charge

 

                                                   

As we discussed a few weeks ago, the number of EEOC charges against Texas employers are on the rise.  The reality is a former employee can file a charge without a lawyer and with relatively little effort.  So the question becomes, once the employer receives the charge, how should they respond? 

Generally, the EEOC will request information related to the claims asserted by the charging party.  In Texas, the EEOC has essentially subcontracted out some of this work to the Texas Workforce Commission.  No matter what agency is leading the investigation, I always encourage clients to be responsive, provide a full explanation, and avoid any further requests from the EEOC or TWC for additional information.  Usually, requests may include witness statements, a response to the actual charge, evidence of other instances similar to the one alleged, and basic factual information. 

In many cases, the EEOC claim will have been preceded by an unemployment proceeding with the TWC.  Always review those filings, both by the employer and the charging party to make sure responses and allegations are consistent from case to case .  There always tend to be some admission by the employee in a TWC proceeding that could potentially bear on the EEOC proceeding.

During the EEOC proceeding, the parties will also have the opportunity to mediate the dispute.  Obviously, resolving cases is good and avoiding attorneys' fees is better.  An EEOC mediation does not cost anything and if you have a case that you think should or could be resolved, mediation might be worth a shot.   Some employers consider a request for a mediation a weakness, I disagree. Mediation provides both the lawyer and the employer an opportunity to size up what type of witness the former employee is actually going to be and provides for essentially some free discovery on a potential lawsuit. 

The majority of charges examined by the EEOC result in a dismissal and a right to sue letter.  Then the question becomes whether the employee will actually proceed with a lawsuit?  If the employee is represented by a lawyer during the EEOC process, odds are the employer is more likely to see a lawsuit. 

Employers, can of  course represent themselves through the EEOC or TWC proceedings.  Of course, as a lawyer, I recommend that they retain counsel to handle these matters.  Though there are many employers who have been through the process on numerous occasions and are more than qualified to deal with it themselves.  That is going to be a case by case, employer by employer determination.

Take the EEOC charge seriously, remember that whatever the employer files could potentially come back as evidence during a lawsuit.  Make sure that your positions are consistent between unemployment proceedings and the EEOC proceeding.

The EEOC's Texas Statistics

 

                                              

 The EEOC recently made the breakdown of its individual charge filings available online for each state.  The statistics run from fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2011.  The top Texas discrimination charges are: (1) retaliation (41%);  (2) race (36.3%); (3) retaliation - Title VII (35.9%); and (4) sex discrimination (29.4%).

Total charges in Texas continue to rise as across the nation.  Employers need to anticipate and be ready for the EEOC charge, whether there is merit to it or not.  All it takes is a former employee to fill out the necessary paperwork and file it with the EEOC.  No lawyer is required and there is no charge for the filing.  From the employee's standpoint, what does it hurt? Maybe they can get the employer to pony up some money to resolve the dispute, even if it is baseless.

Considering Arrest/Conviction Records in the Hiring Process

                                              

Last week, the EEOC provided new enforcement guidelines to be used for determining whether the use of arrest and conviction records is proper in the hiring process as it relates to Title VII.  There has been a fair amount of electronic ink spilled on this topic and I have identified some good sources below for review.

The take away from the article and new guidlines is  that employers cannot use arrest and conviction records with impunity.  Unfortunately, it seems counterintuitive that an employer could not disqualify a potential candidate based upon a conviction.  The EEOC seems to be saying that if that policy is not uniformly applied or if it has disparate impact, there could be ramifications against the employer. 

I understand the distinction the EEOC makes between conviction and arrest records, although arrests usually are the result of some underlying conduct that the employer should consider.  That said, it seems a little much that the EEOC is going out of its way to prepare these new guidelines and regulations with respect to convicted individuals.  I am all for rehabilitation, but ultimately, the employer should be able to eliminate job candidates based upon convictions, when that criteria is uniformly enforced. 

Below are some articles you might consider and the regulations from the EEOC:

Guidance from the EEOC -http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm

Q&A from the EEOC - http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/qa_arrest_conviction.cfm

Connecticut Lawyer Daniel Schwartz on the Issue

Ohio Lawyer Jon Hyman's Take

The Delaware Employment Law Blog Weighs In

Firing Based on Weight

                        

A few weeks ago we discussed a Texas employer hiring new employees based upon their Body Mass Index.  The dangers of considering weight in employment decisions were recently exemplified in a press release from the EEOC. 

In that release, it was announced that a treatment facility for chemically dependent women and children was paying $125,000 to settle a disability discrimination suit filed in September 2010 by the EEOC.  The suit alleged that the employer violated the ADA because it fired a former employee because of her disability, severe obesity, even though she was able to perform the essential functions of her job.  Unfortunately, the employee died prior to the suit being filed.  The EEOC's take on the settlement:

All people with a disability who are qualified for their position are protected from unlawful discrimination,” said EEOC General Counsel David Lopez.  “Severe obesity is no exception.  It is important for employers to realize that stereotypes, myths, and biases about that condition should not be the basis of employment decisions.

Courts have previously concluded that severe obesity may qualify as a disability regardless of whether it is caused by a physiological disorder.  Hiring or firing policies based on weight may be actionable.  Employers need to tread lightly if they are going to consider weight in a hiring/firing decision.(H/T disability law.blogspot.com)