Facebook for Jury Selection

The Great Whiskey Ring Trial courtesy of Cornell University

Although it's nice to have high paid jury consultants and days to ponder potential jurors, the reality is in most jury trials the lawyer is handed a list of potential jurors minutes before they walk in the Courtroom door.  It's then up to the lawyer and his client to sift through basic information about the individual (race, religion, profession etc.) and then ask twenty minutes worth of questions to hopefully learn more.  Jury selection is more of an elimination process than a selection process.

With the rise of social networking sites, blogs, and the like, more an more people have some sort of an internet presence.  Trial lawyers, from prosecutors to defense lawyers, are using that information during the jury selection process.  As illustrated in a recent Wall Street Journal article, lawyers are using the net through ipads and laptops to try an obtain information about prospective jurors as they sit in the courtroom.  An example:

Paul Kiesel, a plaintiffs' lawyer in Beverly Hills, Calif., said his firm ran searches of social-networking sites during the jury-selection process in a recent sex-abuse case involving a Catholic priest. The case was settled, but Mr. Kiesel said the information would have proved invaluable.

"We could glean whether someone was identified with a religion, and get a sense of how devout they seemed to be," he said. "It's a waterfall of information, compared to the pinhole view you used to get."

Jury selection is but one example of lawyers using Internet research.  Assume that the same information is being obtained for potential witnesses and parties at the outset of a lawsuit.  The point is that social networking information is fair game in Court and it provides a candid look in many instances of the thoughts and predispositions of people. 

This type of research will continue and become more extensive as  individuals develop more and more of an on line history.  Don't be surprised if within the next few years there are actually services that will provide this type information for a fee - there are already some that do so in the employment background search world.

 

Caught Red Handed with LinkedIn

                                              

Minnesota based TEKsystems Inc. sued three former employees for violating non-compete and non-solicit agreements.  TEKSystems is in the technical recruiting business and it claims one of the former employees was contacting its contract employees.  The complaint alleges Defendant Brelyn Hammernik used LinkedIn to solicit these employees:

For example, Hammernik has communicated with at least 20 of TEKsystems’ Contract Employees using such electronic networking systems as “Linkedin.”  Hammernik has, at a minimum, “connected” with the following TEKsystems’ employees through “Linkedin" . . . In her contacts with Tom Peterson, Hammernick asked Peterson if he was “still looking for opportunities.” She then stated that she “would love to have [you] come visit my new office and hear about some of the stuff we are working on.”

Evidence doesn't get much better then this LinkedIn email:

Linkedln

Tom Peterson has sent you a message.

Date: 12/08/2009

Subject: RE: Brelyn

 

Hi Brelyn,

Indeed I am still looking. I have time, though!

Lets get together. Where are you working these days? Your profile still has you working at TEK Systems. BTW - my email address is lipidfish@gmail.com if you would prefer the non-Linkedln route.

Tom

 

On 12/08/09 8:47 AM, Brelyn Hammernik wrote:

Tom—

Hey! Let me know if you are still looking for opportunities! I would love to have come visit my new office and hear about some of the stuff we are working on!

Let me know your thoughts!

Brelyn

Needless to say it will be very difficult for Hammernik to defend this type of conduct.  I've used emails in non-compete/non-solicit cases but never LinkedIn evidence.  As individuals migrate from company to company they routinely use LinkedIn and other social networking sites to update contacts on their whereabouts.  Usually, most updates don't contain an outright solicitation like this. The moral of this story:  Employees - be smart about communications that are blatant solicitations.  Employers - watch former employees social networking activities once they have departed.